Emancipation Reform of 1861 Worksheets
Do you want to save dozens of hours in time? Get your evenings and weekends back? Be able to teach about the Emancipation Reform of 1861 to your students?
Our worksheet bundle includes a fact file and printable worksheets and student activities. Perfect for both the classroom and homeschooling!
Resource Examples
Click any of the example images below to view a larger version.
Fact File
Student Activities
Summary
- Background: Serfdom in Russia
- Preliminary Reform Efforts
- Reasons for Reform
- Provisions
- Implementation
- Aftermath and Effect
Key Facts And Information
Let’s know more about the Emancipation Reform of 1861!
The Emancipation Reform of 1861 was led by Tsar Alexander II and ended centuries of serfdom, freeing over 23 million peasants who had been tied to the land and their landlords. The reform aimed to modernise Russia, improve the economy and avoid social unrest.
Although the serfs were granted personal freedom and some were given land, many still faced poverty and hard conditions. The reform was a major step towards change, but it also showed how difficult it was to move away from the old feudal system.
Background: Serfdom in Russia
- Before the Emancipation Reform of 1861, Russia was still mostly a farming country with an old system called serfdom. In this system, many peasants were not free. They were tied to the land and under the control of landlords. Only peasants who lived on private estates were considered true serfs. These serfs made up around 38% of the total population. They had to obey their landlords, do farm work, and often give part of their crops or goods. The landlords had great power over their lives.
- Just before 1861, Russian peasants were mainly divided into three categories:
- State peasants – These lived on lands owned by the state, many of them under the control of the Ministry of State Property. This group included many non-Russians across the empire.
- Crown peasants – These lived on udel lands, which were owned by the royal family or crown.
- Estate peasants (serfs) – These lived on land owned by private landlords. They were considered true serfs and had duties both to the landowner and to the state.
- Most peasants lived in small farming households called dvory, grouped into villages known as derevni. If a village had a church, it was called a selo. The villages were run by a local peasant council called the mir (also called obshchina). The mir chose leaders like the starosta (elder) and a pisar (clerk), who spoke for the village in outside matters.
- In central Russia, land in these villages was not owned by the peasants, but by about 100,000 landowners, known as pomeshchiks (like the landed gentry). The mir shared the land among the peasant families and sometimes changed how it was divided to try to keep things fair. But even though peasants worked the land, they were not free to leave the estate where they were born. They had to pay the landowner through work, goods, or part of their crops. By the mid-1800s, landowners were said to take at least one-third of the income or products made by their serfs.
Preliminary Reform Efforts
- Before the major Emancipation Reform of 1861, there were several early attempts to improve the condition of the peasants and reduce the power of serfdom in Russia.
- In the late 18th century, Tsar Paul I made a small move in 1797 by limiting corvée labour (unpaid work done by peasants for their landlord) to three days a week and banning it on Sundays. However, this law was not enforced, and landlords continued to demand hard labour from the serfs.
- In 1801, Tsar Alexander I set up a committee to study the idea of emancipation. The committee had little power, but it did manage to ban the sale of serfs without their families. Later, in the 1820s and 1830s, Alexander I and his advisers, including Mikhail Speransky, Nikolay Mordvinov and Pavel Kiselyov, created plans to free the serfs or improve their living conditions.
- Some reforms helped state-owned peasants, especially under Kiselyov’s work in the Ministry of State Property. However, strong resistance from the noble landowners prevented wider change. Many nobles feared losing their power and wealth if serfdom was weakened.
- During the reign of Tsar Nicholas I (1825–1855), the idea of emancipation was discussed more often. Nicholas himself spoke many times about freeing the serfs, and he did make life better for peasants on state-owned land. However, he did not introduce reforms for serfs owned by private landlords, so most peasants remained under the old system.
- Support for reform grew among educated Russians, especially in the 19th century. Many university teachers, writers and thinkers believed that serfdom was not only unfair but also holding Russia back. They shared their views in books, articles and speeches, helping to create public support for change. This pressure from intellectual circles made it harder for the government to ignore the problem.
- It is also important to note that in some parts of the Russian Empire, serfdom had already been abolished earlier in the century. In the Baltic provinces, Estonia (1816), Courland (1817) and Livonia (1819), peasants were legally freed, although they still faced limits. In Congress Poland, serfdom was ended by Napoleon in 1807, but when Russia took over in 1815, it was largely brought back again. Although these early efforts did not end serfdom across Russia, they laid the groundwork for future reform.
Reasons for Reform
- By the middle of the 19th century, there were many strong reasons why the Russian government felt it had to end serfdom. One major reason was the backward state of the Russian economy. Most of the population were peasants, and nearly half were serfs who could not move freely or improve their work.
- Farming was slow and old-fashioned because landlords had no reason to invest in better tools or methods, and serfs had little reason to work harder since they did not own the land. This kept Russian agriculture weak and unable to support growth.
- Another important reason was the poor condition of the Russian army. Many of the soldiers were serfs, taken from villages to serve for 25 years. The army was large, but often poorly trained and badly supplied. Russia’s defeat in the Crimean War (1853–1856) showed how weak and outdated the country had become.
- There were also growing problems in society. Serfs were often unhappy and suffered under harsh landlords. In some areas, there were small revolts and growing signs of unrest.
- Many nobles were also struggling. Their income from farming was falling, and they could not afford to manage their estates properly. Some landowners even believed that freeing the serfs might improve their finances in the long term.
- On top of this, the idea of freeing the serfs was becoming more popular among educated Russians, composed of university students, writers and officials. They believed serfdom was morally wrong and made Russia look uncivilised.
- Tsar Alexander II, who became ruler in 1855, understood that reform was needed. He believed that the government should take action before a major peasant uprising forced change. In the end, the Emancipation Reform of 1861 was passed to modernise the economy, avoid social unrest, and keep control in the hands of the state.
Provisions of the Emancipation Reform of 1861
- The Emancipation Reform of 1861 ended serfdom for over 23 million people and aimed to modernise the country. Tsar Alexander II signed the Emancipation Manifesto on 3 March 1861 (19 February in the old Russian calendar). This law was supported by liberal advisers such as Nikolay Milyutin, Alexei Strol’man and Yakov Rostovtsev, who believed that Russia had to end feudalism and catch up with Western Europe after its failure in the Crimean War.
- Main Provisions of the Reform:
- Freedom for serfs – Serfs were granted full rights as free citizens. They could now marry without asking permission, own property, start a business and take legal action. Household (domestic) serfs were also freed, though they received no land.
- Land ownership – Peasants were allowed to buy land from their former landlords. However, this was not simple. They did not get the best land. Large and valuable areas (called otrezki, or ‘cut-off lands’) were kept by the landowners. Often, these included forests, rivers and roads. Peasants had to pay to use these later.
-
- Redemption payments – To buy the land, peasants had to make redemption payments. The government paid the landowner 75% of the land’s value up front using government bonds, and the peasants were expected to pay back the government with interest over 49 years. Many peasants found this debt very hard to repay. These payments were finally cancelled in 1907.
- Transition period – For the first two years after emancipation, peasants were still bound to their former landowners. They continued to work and give services during this temporary obligation period before becoming fully free.
Implementation of the Emancipation Reform
- The way the reform was carried out differed across Russia, as the empire was large and diverse. Each mir (village community) was in charge of dividing the land among the peasants. The land did not belong to individuals but to the whole community. Because of this, peasants could not sell their land or leave easily to work in cities. This slowed down the growth of a market economy, which some reformers had hoped would follow after emancipation.
- In most cases, a peasant could only buy about half of the land he had used before. If he could not afford even that, he would get only a quarter of the land, called a pauper’s allotment (bednyatskiy nadel), for free. These small plots were often not enough to feed a family, and many peasants remained poor.
- In some areas, the reform was delayed. Some mirs did not enter the redemption process at all and stayed under the old rules until 1881, when redemption became compulsory. By the 1880s, many peasants were struggling with high payments and falling behind. In response, the government reduced the average payment by about 13% in 1883.
Aftermath and Effect
- Although the Emancipation Reform of 1861 officially freed millions of serfs, the lives of most peasants did not improve much. Many continued to live in poor conditions. Household serfs, for example, were given no land at all, only their freedom. Peasants who did receive land often found that the land was too small or not good enough to support their families. In places like Congress Poland and parts of northern Russia, many peasants became landless workers, known as batraks, with only their labour to offer.
- One of the biggest problems was the high cost of redemption payments. Peasants had to pay the government for their land over 49 years. These payments were often so heavy that peasants had to sell nearly all their grain just to pay the tax, leaving little food for themselves. In many cases, peasants ended up renting land again from landowners or working for them to cover their labour payments. This made it hard for them to work their own fields properly, which led to poor harvests and hunger. Crop yields remained low for many years after the reform, and famine struck several parts of Russia.
- The unfairness of the reform led to anger and unrest. In some areas, peasants did not believe the emancipation was real, and there were protests. One well-known event happened on 12 April 1861 in the village of Bezdna. There, angry peasants were attacked by local authorities. Around 70 were killed and over 100 were injured.
- The reform also had effects on landowners and nobles. Many of them were already in debt before the reform and had mortgaged their estates. After emancipation, they were forced to give up land and were paid in government bonds, which soon lost value. Many nobles struggled to manage their estates without free labour and had to rent or sell parts of their land. As a result, gentry-owned land fell from 80% to 50%, while peasant land ownership rose from 5% to 20%.
- Politically, the reform brought important changes. It led to the creation of local governments called zemstvos, which were local councils made up of landowners and well-off peasants. These councils were responsible for local matters such as education, health and roads. Although they were not fully democratic, they gave people more of a voice than before.
- The reform also meant that the Tsar had to share some power with local officials, courts, and even a free press. This weakened the idea of total autocracy, even though that was not the original goal of the reform. Economically, the reform helped push Russia towards a more capitalist system. The government hoped to follow Western European models, encouraging free trade, private property and business growth.
- After the reform, grain production increased, more farm tools were used, and many peasants began to work for wages. The number of private landowners who were not nobles also grew.
Image Sources
- https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/16/Reading_of_the_Manifest_%28Liberation_of_peasants%29_-_Kustodiev%2C_1907.jpg/1280px-Reading_of_the_Manifest_%28Liberation_of_peasants%29_-_Kustodiev%2C_1907.jpg
- https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/76/The_Crimean_War_1853-1856_Q69784.jpg/640px-The_Crimean_War_1853-1856_Q69784.jpg
- https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/fd/Alexander_II_1870_by_Sergei_Lvovich_Levitsky.jpg/640px-Alexander_II_1870_by_Sergei_Lvovich_Levitsky.jpg
Frequently Asked Questions About The Emancipation Reform of 1861
- What was the Emancipation Reform of 1861?
The Emancipation Reform of 1861 was a landmark decree issued by Tsar Alexander II that freed the serfs in the Russian Empire. It ended centuries of serfdom, a system where peasants were legally bound to the land and their landlords.
- Who enacted the reform?
The reform was enacted by Tsar Alexander II on 3 March 1861 (19 February in the old Julian calendar), earning him the nickname “Tsar Liberator.”
- Did serfs receive land for free?
No. Most serfs had to buy land from their former landlords through redemption payments, which were often too expensive and left them in debt.