Greek–Bulgarian War (1925) Facts & Worksheets

Greek–Bulgarian War (1925) facts and information plus worksheet packs and fact file. Includes 5 activities aimed at students 11-14 years old (KS3) & 5 activities aimed at students 14-16 years old (GCSE). Great for home study or to use within the classroom environment.

Greek–Bulgarian War (1925) Worksheets

Do you want to save dozens of hours in time? Get your evenings and weekends back? Be able to teach about the Greek–Bulgarian War (1925) to your students?

Our worksheet bundle includes a fact file and printable worksheets and student activities. Perfect for both the classroom and homeschooling!

sh-study

Resource Examples

Click any of the example images below to view a larger version.

Fact File

Greek–Bulgarian-War-1925-Resource-1.png
Greek–Bulgarian-War-1925-Resource-2.png

Student Activities

Greek–Bulgarian-War-1925-Activity-Answer-Guide-1.png
Greek-Bulgarian-War-1925-Activity-Answer-Guide-2.png
Greek–Bulgarian-War-1925-Activity-Answer-Guide-3.png
Greek-Bulgarian-War-1925-Activity-Answer-Guide-4.png
Table of Contents
    Add a header to begin generating the table of contents

    Summary

    • Historical Background
    • The Incident at Petrich 
    • League of Nations Intervention 
    • Aftermath

    Key Facts And Information

    Let’s find out more about the 1925 Greek–Bulgarian War!

    The Incident at Petrich, also known as the War of the Stray Dog, was a brief but intense conflict between Greece and Bulgaria that occurred in 1925 in which Bulgarian soldiers killed a Greek commander and a sentry near Petrich's border on 18 October. This incident quickly escalated, leading to a Greek invasion of Bulgaria. The League of Nations' intervention ultimately resolved the situation, highlighting the volatile nature of the Balkans in the early 20th century and the emerging role of international organisations in conflict mediation.

    Bulgaria (orange) and Greece (Green)
    Bulgaria (orange) and Greece (Green)

    Historical Background

    • The 1925 Greek–Bulgarian conflict had deep historical roots, stemming from long-standing rivalries over territories such as Macedonia and Western Thrace. This rivalry led to prolonged periods of guerrilla warfare and significant conflicts, including the Macedonian Struggle (1904–1908), the Second Balkan War (1913) and World War I (1916–1918). As a result of these conflicts, Aegean Macedonia and Western Thrace fell under Greek control. However, these regions had substantial Bulgarian populations, which fuelled ongoing Bulgarian irredentist activities throughout the interwar period. 
    • Organisations operating from Bulgaria, like the Internal Macedonian Revolutionary Organisation (IMRO) and the Internal Thracian Revolutionary Organisation (ITRO), were central to the irredentist efforts with regards to the international conflict. They frequently conducted raids and terrorist attacks on Greek and Yugoslav territories, perpetuating a cycle of violence and retaliation. 
    • Petrich, located in Bulgarian-held Pirin, Macedonia, served as the administrative centre for the IMRO. During the early interwar years, the IMRO effectively operated as a 'state within a state', wielding significant regional autonomy and power. 
    • The assassination of Bulgarian Prime Minister Aleksandar Stamboliyski in 1923 by the IMRO, following his policies of rapprochement and a subsequent coup, further exacerbated tensions. 
    • The Internal Macedonian Revolutionary Organisation (IMRO) and the Internal Thracian Revolutionary Organisation (ITRO) were nationalist paramilitary groups that emerged in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, primarily active in the Balkans.
    • Founded in 1893, the IMRO initially sought autonomy or independence for Macedonia from Ottoman rule and later from Bulgarian and Greek dominance. The IMRO aimed to achieve its objectives using guerrilla warfare, terrorism and political assassinations
    • The organisation was influential in Macedonia during the interwar period and played a significant role during the Balkan Wars. Its actions often heightened tensions among Bulgaria, Greece and Yugoslavia, contributing to the region's unstable political climate.
    • Similarly, the ITRO, which was founded around the same time and had the same goals as the IMRO, focused on securing autonomy or independence for Thracian territories inhabited by Bulgarians. During the same period, the ITRO carried out guerrilla warfare and engaged in political activism to advance its cause. 
    • The organisation's activities highlighted the nationalist aspirations of Thracian Bulgarians and complicated territorial disputes involving Ottoman, Greek and Bulgarian interests in the region.

    The Incident at Petrich

    • The 1925 Greek–Bulgarian conflict, often referred to as the War of the Stray Dog, is a historical episode marked by conflicting narratives about its initial cause.
    • Two primary versions of events dispute the exact cause of the 1925 conflict. According to one account, Bulgarian sentries shot a Greek soldier who was chasing his stray dog across the border at Demir Kapia on Belasitsa (Belles) on 18 October. This account led to the incident being referred to as the War of the Stray Dog.
    • Another version suggests that Bulgarian soldiers crossed into Greek territory and attacked a Greek outpost at Belasitsa and eventually killed a Greek captain and a sentry. In response, Bulgaria expressed regret and proposed forming a commission of Greek and Bulgarian officers to investigate the incident.
    Theodoros Pangalos
    Theodoros Pangalos
    • However, General Theodoros Pangalos, the head of the Greek administration, rejected this proposal. Instead, Greece issued an ultimatum demanding the punishment of those responsible, an official apology, and compensation amounting to two million French francs for the victims' families.
    • When Bulgaria failed to meet Greece's demands within the stipulated time, Greece invaded on 22 October 1925. Greek forces aimed to occupy the town of Petrich to enforce their terms, leading to skirmishes between Greek and Bulgarian troops. Subsequently, Bulgaria requested the League of Nations' intervention. IMRO chetas (bands) and local volunteers organised defensive lines around Petrich to resist the Greek advance. Greece stated that it did not seek to annex Bulgarian territory but demanded compliance with its compensation and justice terms. 
    • When Bulgaria failed to meet Greece's demands within the stipulated time, Greece invaded on 22 October 1925. Greek forces aimed to occupy the town of Petrich to enforce their terms, leading to skirmishes between Greek and Bulgarian troops. Subsequently, Bulgaria requested the League of Nations' intervention. IMRO chetas (bands) and local volunteers organised defensive lines around Petrich to resist the Greek advance. Greece stated that it did not seek to annex Bulgarian territory but demanded compliance with its compensation and justice terms. 
    • The League of Nations swiftly intervened, sending telegrams to both nations to halt military operations just hours before a major Greek assault, despite initial reports suggesting Petrich's capture.

    League of Nations Intervention 

    • The League of Nations helped and played a significant role in mitigating the situation.
    • The League of Nations ordered an immediate ceasefire, the withdrawal of Greek troops from Bulgarian territory, and mandated Greece to pay £45,000 (3 million Bulgarian levas) in compensation to Bulgaria. Both Greece and Bulgaria accepted the League's decision. However, Greece expressed dissatisfaction with the perceived disparity in treatment compared to Italy's actions during the 1923 Corfu incident, where Italy faced no punitive measures for its aggression against Greece. 
    • To ensure compliance, the League Council dispatched military attachés from France, Italy and the United Kingdom to oversee the cessation of hostilities and the Greek withdrawal. These attachés also recommended delaying Bulgarian forces' reoccupation of the disputed territory to prevent further incidents.
    • Greece was to pay the compensation within two months, while Bulgaria compensated the families of the initial victims.
    • The League of Nations' intervention in the Greek–Bulgarian conflict garnered widespread support from the international community, including major European powers. This backing underscored the growing importance of international organisations in mediating and resolving disputes. 
    • The incident occurred during a time of considerable instability in Europe, just a few years after the end of World War I. Numerous border disputes and a resurgence of nationalist tensions across the continent marked the early 1920s. The conflict between Greece and Bulgaria highlighted the volatile nature of the Balkans, a region long troubled by ethnic and territorial disputes.
    The 1939 flag of the League of Nations.
    The 1939 flag of the League of Nations.
    • Although the League of Nations succeeded in resolving the immediate conflict, the underlying tensions between Greece and Bulgaria remained due to strong nationalist sentiments and unresolved territorial claims. These lingering issues influenced their interactions and relations in the following years and decades. 

    Aftermath

    • The conflict resulted in over 50 casualties, primarily Bulgarian civilians, highlighting the human cost of the brief war. The League of Nations' resolution emphasised international organisations' potential to mediate and resolve disputes between smaller nations, setting a precedent for future interventions.
    • Despite the peaceful resolution, underlying tensions between Greece and Bulgaria persisted, influenced by nationalist sentiments and unresolved territorial claims. The incident exemplified the challenges the League of Nations faced in enforcing its decisions impartially, especially when dealing with conflicts involving larger powers versus smaller nations. 
    • The 1925 Greek–Bulgarian War was a significant episode in the tumultuous history of the Balkans: World War I, World War II, Yugoslav Wars (1991–2001), Bosnian War (1992–1995) and the Kosovo War (1998–1999). It highlighted the fragility of peace in the region and the ongoing impact of territorial disputes. The intervention by the League of Nations provided a framework for international conflict resolution, although it also exposed the limitations and biases inherent in such efforts.
    • In the contemporary period, Greece and Bulgaria maintained strong bilateral relations characterised by cooperation in political, economic and energy sectors. Both countries are active members of the European Union and NATO, working together to ensure regional stability and security.
    • The War of the Stray Dog continues to serve as a reminder of the complexities of nationalism, territorial integrity and international diplomacy in the early 20th century. The incident at Petrich serves as a case study of the efficacy and challenges of international peacekeeping efforts. It emphasises the importance of diplomatic engagement and the need for global mechanisms to address and resolve cross-border conflicts, which remain relevant in contemporary geopolitical discourse.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    • What was the Greek–Bulgarian War of 1925?

      The Greek–Bulgarian War, also known as the Incident at Petrich, was a brief military conflict that occurred between Greece and Bulgaria in October 1925. A border incident near the town of Petrich triggered it.

    • What role did the League of Nations play in the Greek–Bulgarian War?

      The League of Nations intervened quickly to mediate the conflict. Both Greece and Bulgaria were members of the League, and it successfully brokered a ceasefire and negotiated a settlement to prevent further escalation.

    • How did the Greek–Bulgarian War affect relations between Greece and Bulgaria?

      The war strained relations between Greece and Bulgaria, but the quick intervention and resolution by the League of Nations helped to prevent a long-term conflict. The incident highlighted the effectiveness of the League in managing international disputes.